Wear Your Voice | The Facts.

2020-02-10 09_36_51-Misinformation Campa

Roslyn. I can only assume that

by including the word "misinformation" in this article's title that you are prepared to prove which information is wrong, and which information is the right information? I guess I will find out as I read. But before that, let me point out one thing. You say that we don't "believe survivors". Am I to assume that by "survivors" you mean women? And furthermore, how exactly do we not believe survivors? We believe Johnny Depp, and he is a survivor.

Unless you think the only person capable of being a survivor is Amber Heard.

Your misandry is showing, Roslyn. Let me help you exterminate it.

2020-02-10 09_43_47-Misinformation Campa

Ah, yes, I see that we are going with the "only women can be abused" ideology here.

First, no one is "coddling" Johnny Depp.

People are only seeing what they have failed to see for a long time: that Johnny Depp has been the only abuse victim in this relationship since 2016. You are going to make up some harebrained scenario to prove that Amber Heard was the abuse victim, I can feel it, and let me promise you something: there is a 110% chance that you are going to be wrong.

You are also still going with the narrative that there is NO WAY Amber Heard could have either been the only abuser in this relationship, OR lying about being abused.

2020-02-10 09_49_05-Misinformation Campa

I am just wondering if you actually really listened to the audio tape...or if your selective #believewomen hearing took over. The reason I am wondering this is because in a second you are going to suggest that despite Heard's admission that she hit him, Depp also abused her.

First, no, the conversation wasn't taken out of context, and since there are 70 more tapes to come, we will be hearing more like this. It is definitive proof that Heard is the abuser.

HOW DO YOU SUPPOSE JOHNNY DEPP ABUSED HER ALL THE TIME WHEN HE NEVER STUCK AROUND TO FIGHT WITH HER?

Heard's literal problem for the entire hour long conversation is that Depp refuses to stay and fight with her, because she always gets violent. She is the only one who is mentioned to get violent, besides Depp throwing a can at her in retaliation...and she never denies any of it. She also never brings up any violence he initiates, because there isn't any. The ONE time she mentions that he "participates"...she says he "hits back", but he is quick to correct her. He pushes her away from him so she stops beating on him.

This one recording does cement her as the evil, lying, gold-digging, fame-hungry monster. If you recall in her allegations, she claims she was never allowed to question his authority. Ever, at risk of being beaten. But in the tape, she is the only one screaming at him, insulting him, and mocking him. Meanwhile, Depp is calm, quiet, subdued, and reasonable.

By the way, how do you feel about her feeding HIM A LITERAL XANAX TO KEEP HIM AGREEABLE? I guess you failed to hear that part.

An abuse survivor has been ignored, and since you posted this bullshit article, he is still apparently being ignored by you.

See, told ya.

2020-02-10 10_02_10-Misinformation Campa

Ooook, so you think that Depp's lawsuit is in "bad faith" because you think Depp is lying? You really think that? Being a person that holds a degree in writing and research, it is astonishing to me that you have reviewed all of the evidence in this case only to walk away with the belief that DEPP is the one lying. I can only conclude that you have NOT read all of the evidence in this case.

What a surprise.

Ok, the next few sentences prove what I already suspected: this article was sponsored and approved by Heard and her legal team.

You suggest that Depp is trying to "intimidate her and re-traumatize her"...but the op-ed that she wrote talks about Depp and the fact that she accused him of domestic violence two years before she wrote it...the fact that every single news source who reviewed her op-ed MENTIONED that she was talking about Depp left that to no mystery whatsoever. AND she never corrected any of them. So how exactly is he trying to intimdate her by calling her out on her own lie?

The "leave it to a narcissist" line is what honed me in on "this is a paid for article", because that line literally describes Amber Heard, not Johnny Depp.

Let's talk about Heard's 300 pages of documents. Take a moment to review the breakdown I already did awhile ago of this "evidence".

https://egyptgypsie.wixsite.com/heardsdismissal/pages-25-29

https://egyptgypsie.wixsite.com/heardsdismissal/pages-30-33

https://egyptgypsie.wixsite.com/heardsdismissal/pages-34-38

What you will discover is that Amber Heard actually had no credible evidence. The photos she submitted did not match her description of events AND had no metadata to prove she even took them close to or immediately after the incidents. She had no witnesses. There is nothing there to "establish a clear pattern of domestic violence against her" and if you believe there is, you are being willfully ignorant.

AS I ALREADY SAID, the reason that people switched sides is because her evidence was already super questionable, so when she is caught on tape admitting to being the aggressive one, of COURSE people are going to wake up.

Meanwhile, this is what Johnny Depp has to prove she is an abuser:

- 42 witnesses (actual witnesses)

- 72 audio tapes

- 87 surveillance videos

- Photographs

- Text messages

- Her arrest record

- Her deposition

- Expert witnesses

And you are really going to sit here and tell me that all of that is a "misinformation campaign to designed to provoke intense reactions and guilt people into supporting him at the expense of Heard"?

No dear, this article is an attempt to manipulate people into thinking that this woman is incapable of violence and dishonesty.

2020-02-10 10_19_32-Misinformation Campa

LOL, you are really citing Refinery29 as a source?

Again, what a surprise.

I say that because Refinery29 is the same website that iO Tillet Wright committed perjury on when he wrote an article describing how he "witnessed" abuse by Johnny Depp.

You will find this video about iO Tillet Wright's claims and witness credibility to be very enlightening. Basically, he never saw anything and lied a lot of times.

But anyway, again, I get to prove you wrong. Number one, Amber Heard's version of the finger story has changed 4 times.

Meanwhile, Johnny Depp's version of the finger story has changed 0 times.

This is the version of the story that Depp has told from day 1. Try again.

2020-02-10 10_30_21-Misinformation Campa

Ok, so we are really going with completely wrong information here, aren't we? You are suggesting that when Amber Heard admitted that she hit Johnny Depp, she was talking about the incident she described where she "hit him to protect her sister" (which, by the way, didn't happen either) - No, she was referring to the night before that recording took place. When she punched him. And then he texted his security guard, Travis, to whom she lied.

This is such blatant misinformation on your part that it is laughable. She never "hit Depp to protect her sister" and she certainly hit him more than once.

So, no, Roslyn, your's and Amber's lies are NOT obvious.

Honestly you are such a pathetic journalist and Heard ass licker that I am not going to give you any more time. I care about facts and evidence, not gender. You care about...I don't even know. Your bullshit agenda?

Fuck you, Roslyn.